Skip to main content

U.S.S. Enterprise, NCC-1701-D (1/1400 scale model)

Seven decades after Kirk.

I'd been hooked on Star Trek since I was a wee lad in the 1970s, watching reruns of the original series from the '60s, and I enjoyed the movies that came out afterward. When a new series was announced to debut in 1987, I was excited and interested, even though I felt the subtitle "The Next Generation" was cheesy. Nearly 30 years later, I've definitely gotten used to it (but "TNG" is easier to say and type), but I still find it kinda bland.

Anyway, the show had fresh new technology and a spanking new design for its main ship, the U.S.S. Enterprise, NCC-1701-D, now the flagship of the Federation. Andrew Probert's design took some getting used to for me; it had the same basic elements of the original Enterprise (saucer, neck, cylinder, and two cylindrical engines on pylons), but the shapes and volumes were distributed differently, weirdly. Everything looked squished and soft. The organic look of this new ship had me staring at early photos, trying to figure it out, and when the show aired, I tuned in every week, still trying to wrap my head around it.

Box art with tangents

First issued by AMT/ERTL in 1988, I built this kit in either 1992 or '93. I finally got a good sense of the shape of the ship.

The tangents I mention above are the O and the N from "Generation" touching (not overlapping, but precisely intersecting with) the front of the saucer. A nudge here, a slight reduction is size there, and they could have been avoided.

Minimal build.

As with all of my starship models in the '90s, I didn't go very far with detailing them. I simply assembled the parts, glued them together, painted a few key bits, and applied the decals. No filling of seam lines, no aztecking...I didn't even paint the phaser strips! Luckily, the ship was molded in coloured plastic, saving me the trouble of painting the whole thing.

Holding up.

The decals on the D have held up much better than the ones on my Voyager, on which the carrier film  (but not the decals themselves) has yellowed over the decades.

Nearly nude.

The Enterprise looks naked with only the decals adorning it; no painted aztec pattern (but you can see it in relief, molded into the kit), no painted phaser strips or escape pods (the larger square details), no windows cut out or drawn in. Bare. Plain...

Top heavy.

Sometimes I see this design as extremely beautiful and elegant, and sometimes I think it's misproportioned and ugly. And from some angles, like this one, it looks silly, where I feel the original Enterprise and the refit both look nice from all angles.

The model itself is top heavy –especially since I attached the stand the wrong way! For over 20 years, the ship has been flying towards the ground because of this oversight (I've corrected the angles in these photos).

Ugh.

I still don't think I've grown to like the look of the main deflector and this angle of the engineering hull (it looks okay from the side and back). It doesn't help that my modelling skills were pretty crap at this point, this being only one of the first few I ever built. I mean, look at the crappy way I used a marker to draw in some of the windows. Jeez.

Nacelles.

Of all the flattening of this ship, I think the nacelles receive it the best. I painted the insides of the clear plastic parts (red and blue) with acrylics which seemed to work out okay. Would I light this kit if I were to build it today? I don't know, man...all those windows...


Looks good from the back.

I like this angle a lot, too.

This angle minimizes the enormous saucer section and makes the ship look very active. I'm sure we see it like this a few times on the show.

Nice profile.

This also minimizes the wideness of the saucer section and the overall design looks very well-proportioned. I also like the addition of the notch cutaway in the lower hull towards the back before the warp pylons, a Starfleet design hallmark that also shows up on the Excelsior and the Voyager.

Okay, fine.

Yeah, I sometimes think the saucer section is too big and ungainly, but I really like this angle, mostly because you can't see much of the rest of the ship, so the proportions don't look weird; just the saucer and the engines, really.

Look at all that great molded detail I failed to take advantage of!







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Axel Foley's Chevy Nova (1/25 scale model)

Multiple tributes, here. I remember first seeing  Beverly Hills Cop  on video at my friend Chris K's house, 'cause his family had a VCR and we'd watch tons of movies (and record music videos) together. The summer of 1984 was a special time for us (having created a strong bond in school since Grade 6 a few years before), going on biking adventures around the 'burbs and into the city, etc., and home video played an important role from then until I moved to the opposite end of Scarborough just before we started high school. We liked the movie a lot, both of us fans of Eddie Murphy from his  Saturday Night Live  days. I don't think I'd seen the movie since then (it would have been 1985, probably summer, since the movie came out in late 1984) and I became curious to see if it still held up. It did. It does. I found Murphy as charming as ever and the comedy (and even the action) holds up very well and its very re-watchable and very entertaining.  Beverly Hi...

Small Pond Arts Puppet Wagon (1/24 scale model)

I dreamed up the Small Pond Shipyard for my fanciful scratch-built sci-fi airship creations (which still only exist in sketch/Photoshop mock-up form (and boxes in my closet) for now), but more and more ideas kept coming ( this wind turbine , for example, will be part of a rather elaborate diorama I'll be working on this winter). But the Puppet Wagon was a sleeper surprise, to be sure. [Really, though, I don't know why I was so eager to build this right away since I was planning to slowly develop my modelling skills with simpler builds first and the work my way up to more complicated projects.] Not all parts were used/needed. Most of these ideas have come from watching modelling videos online, and when I saw a review of this sweet little Japanese "Ramen Shop" food truck by Aoshima (right-side drive!), my brain started making jokes about customizing it to the weird food truck ideas I'd been posting on Facebook. But the more I thought about what the co...

City of Angels

17" x 11", watercolour and digital, 1999 Ah, City of Angels . I thought I was getting cool film noir but got a cheesy musical instead (Google it if you must). Still, it was fun to make the poster and associated images, mostly because the research consisted of watching real films noir and buying a great book on movie posters of the genre. I made tons of sketches and a few digital mock-ups. For the final poster above, I made three separate watercolour paintings (one of the couple and one each of the two black and white heads) and composited them in Photoshop, where I also added the text. In true movie poster fashion, I wanted the actors names to be the top two names, but I lost that battle and had to use the characters' names instead. It looks fine, but it implies that "Kingsley and Stone" are the lead actors in the show. Oh, well...it's only community theatre... By making the "angel" above half black and white and half colour, th...