Skip to main content

Jumpers

40" x 30", oil on canvas, 2019

This painting is based on a photo I took at Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump in Fort Macleod, Alberta. I find skeletons and skulls fascinating (we all have at least one, after all) and when I saw this wall display of dozens of buffalo skulls I was mesmerized by the patterns, shapes, shadows, and sheer volume of bones.

Here's how that place got its name. It's a coincidence, of course, but I think it's wonderfully appropriate that this was done over top a failed painting I was calling Gravity Loves to Win (see below). Maybe I should have kept that title for this painting...maybe I still could...

Detail.

My technique on this painting is different from my normal cross-hatch-style of brushwork, largely because I started blocking in shadows with an older brush, giving me a softer look...and I just kept going like that with very little cross-hatching. I did go back in with some sharply-defined darks and highlights, but having a nice looseness with those older brushes, I wanted to maintain that look. This soft-and-loose approach is most likely a one-off as I don't know if it would lend itself to other paintings I have in mind. We'll see...

Pencils.

At this stage, things were kind of hard to see since I didn't apply a thick enough coat of gesso to cover the previous painting. But with some concentration and patience, I was able to figure out pretty much what was what and blocked-in my forms and shadows accordingly.

Salad days.

While composing this image in Photoshop out of four different elements, I thought this would be an interesting and elaborate –maybe even an improved– version of my original watercolour painting (see below). Although, I couldn't decide which way it should go for a long time, finally settling on this horizontal orientation just before ditching the whole project.

Then the movie Gravity came out (I still haven't seen it, by the way) which apparently featured a woman falling to earth from orbit at some point and I kind of lost interest (even though my image was completely unrelated to that movie and the title is a line from 32, a song by Wild Strawberries (again, see my watercolour painting from 1998). I set aside this painting still in this drawing-and-orange-ground stage for a few years (but only partly because of the movie; other projects took precedence).

I blocked in some shadows in the figure in 2016 during a photoshoot with a local photographer, but then set the painting aside for another long stretch while I again worked on other, more pressing projects.

I admit: I lost track of my printed photo reference (and found it again) a few times over the years after I'd set up the painting, and my computer suffered a catastrophic crash in 2014, leaving me with no digital version. That's no excuse, but I gravitated (no pun intended) to relatively "easier" projects rather than digitally rebuilding that composition. I do have that printed reference now, though.

I resumed painting this last year and it looked like it was going well, what with my new interest in glazing...and I liked those clouds...but it wasn't quite coming together and I was reminded of another failed painting from a few years ago which also featured the same model and also was another oil variation of a previous watercolour painting (which had its own oil variation already). So I started having reservations about this painting...

Then, early this year, I was looking through my photos for ideas and came across my photo of the wall of buffalo skulls I'd shot back in the previous decade and decided to recycle Gravity Loves to Win and do what I'd hoped would be (and did turn out to be) a much better painting. Huzzah.

Gravity Loves to Win
32" x 40", oil on canvas
(2012-2018 –unfinished, recycled)

And here is the watercolour painting I did in 1998:

Gravity Loves to Win
22" x 15", watercolour, 1998



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Axel Foley's Chevy Nova (1/25 scale model)

Multiple tributes, here. I remember first seeing  Beverly Hills Cop  on video at my friend Chris K's house, 'cause his family had a VCR and we'd watch tons of movies (and record music videos) together. The summer of 1984 was a special time for us (having created a strong bond in school since Grade 6 a few years before), going on biking adventures around the 'burbs and into the city, etc., and home video played an important role from then until I moved to the opposite end of Scarborough just before we started high school. We liked the movie a lot, both of us fans of Eddie Murphy from his  Saturday Night Live  days. I don't think I'd seen the movie since then (it would have been 1985, probably summer, since the movie came out in late 1984) and I became curious to see if it still held up. It did. It does. I found Murphy as charming as ever and the comedy (and even the action) holds up very well and its very re-watchable and very entertaining.  Beverly Hi...

Small Pond Arts Puppet Wagon (1/24 scale model)

I dreamed up the Small Pond Shipyard for my fanciful scratch-built sci-fi airship creations (which still only exist in sketch/Photoshop mock-up form (and boxes in my closet) for now), but more and more ideas kept coming ( this wind turbine , for example, will be part of a rather elaborate diorama I'll be working on this winter). But the Puppet Wagon was a sleeper surprise, to be sure. [Really, though, I don't know why I was so eager to build this right away since I was planning to slowly develop my modelling skills with simpler builds first and the work my way up to more complicated projects.] Not all parts were used/needed. Most of these ideas have come from watching modelling videos online, and when I saw a review of this sweet little Japanese "Ramen Shop" food truck by Aoshima (right-side drive!), my brain started making jokes about customizing it to the weird food truck ideas I'd been posting on Facebook. But the more I thought about what the co...

U.S.S. Enterprise, NCC-1701-D (1/1400 scale model)

Seven decades after Kirk. I'd been hooked on Star Trek since I was a wee lad in the 1970s, watching reruns of the original series from the '60s, and I enjoyed the movies that came out afterward. When a new series was announced to debut in 1987, I was excited and interested, even though I felt the subtitle "The Next Generation" was cheesy. Nearly 30 years later, I've definitely gotten used to it (but "TNG" is easier to say and type), but I still find it kinda bland. Anyway, the show had fresh new technology and a spanking new design for its main ship, the U.S.S. Enterprise , NCC-1701-D, now the flagship of the Federation. Andrew Probert 's design took some getting used to for me; it had the same basic elements of the original Enterprise  (saucer, neck, cylinder, and two cylindrical engines on pylons), but the shapes and volumes were distributed differently, weirdly. Everything looked squished and soft. The organic look of this new ship had me ...